Re: [gpsd-dev] [PATCH]: Handle lack of TIOCEXCL and TIOCNXCL on cygwin

[Matt]

Please do. But FYI, my interest in cygwin is mainly as a stepping-stone 
towards a high-quality mingw port.

On 06/09/14 17:28, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> uMatt <address@hidden>:
> > The cygwin headers don't seem to define these. We can still attempt
> > to work without them.
> I've merged this and your previous.
>
> Should I list you as Cygwin port maintainer?