[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform
From: |
Damian McGuckin |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:21:13 +1100 (AEDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.02 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016, Steve Izma wrote:
I'm wondering how CPU configurations affect groff processing
speed.
Groff consumes very little time, even when it is used to format a 200 page
documents with tables, graphs, pictures, and so on. 30 years on a Motorola
68000, I sat and waited a minute or so for it to do big documents. Not any
more.
I'm also interested in bitmap editing (gimp) and batch processing
of bitmaps using convert (imagemagick) or python, but groff is my
main concern. Any advice?
Your bitmap processing is likely to be the a bigger consumer of CPU
time.
Without details of what you are doing in Python, I cannot comment.
Regards - Damian
Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037
Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here
Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
- [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Steve Izma, 2016/03/20
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform,
Damian McGuckin <=
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Larry Kollar, 2016/03/23
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Steve Izma, 2016/03/23
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Clarke Echols, 2016/03/23
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/03/24
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Morten Bo Johansen, 2016/03/24
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/03/24
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, James K. Lowden, 2016/03/24