[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular.
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular. |
Date: |
Fri, 06 May 2016 13:39:26 +0100 |
Hi Deri,
> The problem is that most installations are from compiled binaries, so
> this step either needs to be done by the packager, who would then need
> to make the URW fonts a dependency
I wasn't thinking of the `U' foundry for URW fonts particularly, just
that the package's post-install should BuildFoundries to snapshot
whatever fonts happen to be about at that time. And if the user adds
more fonts then they can use the package manager's "re-install" to bring
gropdf up to date. Would that be feasible and useful?
Cheers, Ralph.
- [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Ralph Corderoy, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Ted Harding, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Werner LEMBERG, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Deri James, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Ralph Corderoy, 2016/05/05
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Deri James, 2016/05/05
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular.,
Ralph Corderoy <=