[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Aug 2022 07:39:43 -0500 |
At 2022-08-27T14:22:08+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> The remaining problem is that you only committed half of the fix.
>
> The .nf or .fi, respectively, needs to be done unconditionally, like
> it was in my original minimal patch, even if an*is-in-example is in
> the wrong state, such that even a stray .EX or .EE at least produces a
> break.
Fair point. I'll fix the fix. Thanks for catching this.
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: groff 1.23.0.rc2 readiness, Bertrand Garrigues, 2022/08/21
- Re: groff 1.23.0.rc2 readiness, John Gardner, 2022/08/24
- Re: groff 1.23.0.rc2 readiness, G. Branden Robinson, 2022/08/24
- Re: groff 1.23.0.rc2 readiness, Ingo Schwarze, 2022/08/26
- groff maintainership, release, and blockers (was: groff 1.23.0.rc2 readiness), G. Branden Robinson, 2022/08/26
- Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers, Bertrand Garrigues, 2022/08/26
- Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers, Sam James, 2022/08/26
- Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers, Ingo Schwarze, 2022/08/27
- Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers, G. Branden Robinson, 2022/08/27
- Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers, Ingo Schwarze, 2022/08/27
- Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers,
G. Branden Robinson <=
- Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers, Dave Kemper, 2022/08/28
- Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers, Bertrand Garrigues, 2022/08/28
- Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers (was: groff 1.23.0.rc2 readiness), Ingo Schwarze, 2022/08/27
- Re: groff maintainership, release, and blockers (was: groff 1.23.0.rc2 readiness), Ralph Corderoy, 2022/08/29