[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] [grotty]: Use terminfo.
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] [grotty]: Use terminfo. |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Sep 2023 12:56:43 -0500 |
[self-follow-up]
At 2023-09-01T12:47:58-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > + if (curr_back_idx != back_idx) {
> > + putp(tparm(set_a_background, back_idx, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0));
> > + curr_back_idx = back_idx;
>
> What were people thinking? It's SO MUCH CHEAPER to pass 9 longs on
> the stack than a pointer to a struct
[or array]
> (which a good compiler will find a register for anyway).
[but probably not on 32-bit x86]
In reviewing my message I experienced a sudden horror that I may have
been too subtle here.
My remark was intended as the deepest possible,
so-black-that-Anish-Kapoor-has-already-sent-me-a-cease-and-desist-letter
sarcasm.
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [PATCH v2] [grotty]: Use terminfo., G. Branden Robinson, 2023/09/01
- Re: [PATCH v2] [grotty]: Use terminfo.,
G. Branden Robinson <=
- Re: [PATCH v2] [grotty]: Use terminfo., G. Branden Robinson, 2023/09/01
- Re: [PATCH v2] [grotty]: Use terminfo., Lennart Jablonka, 2023/09/01
- Re: [PATCH v2] [grotty]: Use terminfo., Lennart Jablonka, 2023/09/02
- [PATCH v3] [grotty]: Use terminfo., Lennart Jablonka, 2023/09/04
- Re: [PATCH v3] [grotty]: Use terminfo., Lennart Jablonka, 2023/09/21
- Re: [PATCH v3] [grotty]: Use terminfo., G. Branden Robinson, 2023/09/22
- Re: [PATCH v3] [grotty]: Use terminfo., Lennart Jablonka, 2023/09/22
Re: [PATCH v2] [grotty]: Use terminfo., Lennart Jablonka, 2023/09/01