[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"?
From: |
shynur . |
Subject: |
Re: Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"? |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Aug 2024 08:27:38 +0000 |
> the behavior is easily confirmed.
>
> $ case <(:) in '<(:)') echo not expanded;; *) echo expanded;; esac
> expanded
Indeed, despite the manual doesn't mention "process substitution":
The _word_ undergoes tilde expansion, parameter expansion,
command substitution, arithmetic expansion, and quote
removal before matching is attempted.
- Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"?, shynur ., 2024/08/23
- Re: Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"?, Eric Pruitt, 2024/08/23
- Re: Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"?, shynur ., 2024/08/23
- Re: Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"?, Lawrence Velázquez, 2024/08/23
- Re: Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"?,
shynur . <=
- Re: Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"?, Eric Pruitt, 2024/08/24
- Re: Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"?, Lawrence Velázquez, 2024/08/24
- Re: Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"?, Eric Pruitt, 2024/08/24
- Re: Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"?, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/26
- Re: Why does case-pattern undergo "process substitution"?, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/26