[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv
From: |
Musaul Karim |
Subject: |
Re: question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:31:22 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
Hi Bob, my coreutils version is 6.10 as well. This is in xubuntu 9.04.
When I run ...
$ mv -v 1 /var/tmp/
... on a two level deep directory structure with files file1 to 5
gives me the following output, which seems consistent with what
happened earlier.
`1' -> `/var/tmp/1'
`1/src' -> `/var/tmp/1/src'
`1/src/file3' -> `/var/tmp/1/src/file3'
`1/src/file1' -> `/var/tmp/1/src/file1'
`1/src/file5' -> `/var/tmp/1/src/file5'
`1/src/file4' -> `/var/tmp/1/src/file4'
`1/src/file2' -> `/var/tmp/1/src/file2'
removed `1/src/file3'
removed `1/src/file1'
removed `1/src/file5'
removed `1/src/file4'
removed `1/src/file2'
removed directory: `1/src'
removed directory: `1'
I'll try out strace later to see if it is in fact waiting for all
files to be copied before removing them.
Thanks Henrik. I'll try the 'find' way the next time I need to copy
large numbers of files.
- question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv, Musaul Karim, 2009/10/23
- Re: question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv, Henrik Carlqvist, 2009/10/23
- Re: question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv, Bob Proulx, 2009/10/25
- Message not available
- Re: question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv,
Musaul Karim <=
- Re: question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv, Henrik Carlqvist, 2009/10/26
- Re: question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv, Bob Proulx, 2009/10/26
- Message not available
- Re: question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv, Henrik Carlqvist, 2009/10/26
- Re: question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv, Bob Proulx, 2009/10/26
- Message not available
- Re: question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv, Henrik Carlqvist, 2009/10/27
- Re: question about the "copy, then remove" behaviour of mv, Bob Proulx, 2009/10/26