Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

[Hans Åberg]

> On Oct 7, 2023, at 07:43, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
> 
>> libpaper is listed on
>> https://ports.macports.org/port/ghostscript/details/
>> 
>> Well, that's too bad since there is no actual license
>> incompatibility due to the use as subprocess, as already noted by
>> several others. Not sure if MacPorts can be taught that.
> 
> It would be a manual override by the MacPorts people to get pre-built
> LilyPond binaries.
> 
> However, a better solution to the whole problem is actually quite
> simple, providing someone has some experience with MacPorts and a bit
> of spare time: Just provide a Pull Request for
> 
>  https://trac.macports.org/ticket/66653
> 
> to get an LGPLed 'libpaper' library.

Dependent dynamic libraries, when binaries, are in MacPorts not bundled with 
the programs that depend on them, but installed separately, and linked at 
runtime. From a copyright point of view, this does not seem different from 
calling another installed program.