[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[MIT-Scheme-devel] working directory
From: |
Matt Birkholz |
Subject: |
[MIT-Scheme-devel] working directory |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:33:48 -0700 |
> From: Taylor R Campbell <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:41:47 +0000
>
> We have a pretty random notion of a `working directory pathname',
> which is sorta kinda correlated with the `default pathname defaults'
> and the operating system's notion of the process's working directory.
>
> Does anyone rely on this klunky semantics?
I rely on the default pathname defaults to do everything, i.e. produce
absolute pathnames (URIs?). Thus I do not have to think about the OS
process's working directory. I do not often think of the OS process
at all. I like that. I like not dropping into C to frob things I
don't use.
How did you notice a klunkiness? How do I produce a klunk? I tried
(with-working-directory-pathname "~/Scheme/MIT/src/"
(lambda () (run-shell-command "cat makefiles_created")))
and it works correctly regardless of the OS process's mumblefrotz.
Are there procedures like run-shell-command that do not already
"fchdir, if necessary"?
> This is all basically what scsh does, as described in the paper by
> Martin Gasbichler and Mike Sperber, except that scsh uses pathnames
> and chdir rather than directory file descriptors and fchdir.
>
> Any objections?
If I spawn a hundred threads, do they open a hundred file descriptors?
If I pass "/absolute/filename" to a primitive that theoretically
depends on the cwd (as I am wont to do), will it now have to frob some
OS randomness before doing as I ask?
> If I implement this, will whoever cares about Windows figure out how
> to make it work there?
For appropriate values of "cares about Windows", yes. :-)
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] working directory, Taylor R Campbell, 2011/02/09
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] working directory,
Matt Birkholz <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] working directory, Taylor R Campbell, 2011/02/13
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] working directory, Taylor R Campbell, 2011/02/13
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] working directory, Matt Birkholz, 2011/02/15
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] working directory, Taylor R Campbell, 2011/02/15
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] working directory, Joe Marshall, 2011/02/15
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] working directory, Matt Birkholz, 2011/02/15