[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use of Vagrant in tests poses licencing question
From: |
Ole Tange |
Subject: |
Re: Use of Vagrant in tests poses licencing question |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2024 20:01:20 +0100 |
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 4:23 AM Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
:
> > Since there are no licensing issues using 2.3.7, I will continue to use
> that.
>
> Thanks. With that policy, GNU Parallel has no actual problem in its code.
> Would you please state that decision explicitly in GNU Parallel,
> perhaps in the README or wherever people building it will see it?
I am building a script that installs and sets up all the requirements
needed to run the testsuite, so I think this would be the right place
to have this.
I think a solution that adheres to POLA would be to check if Vagrant
is installed and if not install version 2.3.7.
> Is there a place that distributes Vagrant 2.3.7's tar ball
> without requiring the user to run Javascript code? You could link to that.
The binary is on: https://releases.hashicorp.com/vagrant/2.3.7/ which
I probably would use in the script above.
However, https://releases.hashicorp.com/vagrant/2.3.7/ does not
distribute the source code.
> Otherwise, how about if you redistribute Vagrant 2.3.7's tar ball?
I could put the source.tar on www.gnu.org/s/parallel
I do not expect that tar would get many hits.
/Ole