qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] msix: add valid.accepts methods to check address


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msix: add valid.accepts methods to check address
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 08:03:18 +0200

On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:02 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 6/1/20 7:14 AM, P J P wrote:
> > From: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
> >
> > While doing msi-x mmio operations, a guest may send an address
> > that leads to an OOB access issue. Add valid.accepts methods to
> > ensure that ensuing mmio r/w operation don't go beyond regions.
> >
>
> Fixes: CVE-2020-xxxxx

Oh and please also add:

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org

>
> > Reported-by: Ren Ding <rding@gatech.edu>
> > Reported-by: Hanqing Zhao <hanqing@gatech.edu>
> > Reported-by: Anatoly Trosinenko <anatoly.trosinenko@gmail.com>
> > Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
> > ---
> >  hw/pci/msix.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/pci/msix.c b/hw/pci/msix.c
> > index 29187898f2..d90d66a3b8 100644
> > --- a/hw/pci/msix.c
> > +++ b/hw/pci/msix.c
> > @@ -193,6 +193,15 @@ static void msix_table_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr 
> > addr,
> >      msix_handle_mask_update(dev, vector, was_masked);
> >  }
> >
> > +static bool msix_table_accepts(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size,
> > +                                    bool is_write, MemTxAttrs attrs)
> > +{
> > +    PCIDevice *dev = opaque;
> > +    uint16_t tbl_size = dev->msix_entries_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
> > +
> > +    return dev->msix_table + addr + 4 <= dev->msix_table + tbl_size;
>
> Can be simplified as:
>
>        return addr + 4 <= dev->msix_entries_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
>
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const MemoryRegionOps msix_table_mmio_ops = {
> >      .read = msix_table_mmio_read,
> >      .write = msix_table_mmio_write,
> > @@ -200,6 +209,7 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps msix_table_mmio_ops = {
> >      .valid = {
> >          .min_access_size = 4,
> >          .max_access_size = 4,
> > +        .accepts = msix_table_accepts
> >      },
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -221,6 +231,15 @@ static void msix_pba_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr 
> > addr,
> >  {
> >  }
> >
> > +static bool msix_pba_accepts(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size,
> > +                                    bool is_write, MemTxAttrs attrs)
> > +{
> > +    PCIDevice *dev = opaque;
> > +    uint16_t pba_size = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(dev->msix_entries_nr, 64) / 8;
> > +
> > +    return dev->msix_pba + addr + 4 <= dev->msix_pba + pba_size;
>
> Can be simplified as:
>
>        return addr + 4 <= QEMU_ALIGN_UP(dev->msix_entries_nr, 64) / 8;
>
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const MemoryRegionOps msix_pba_mmio_ops = {
> >      .read = msix_pba_mmio_read,
> >      .write = msix_pba_mmio_write,
> > @@ -228,6 +247,7 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps msix_pba_mmio_ops = {
> >      .valid = {
> >          .min_access_size = 4,
> >          .max_access_size = 4,
> > +        .accepts = msix_pba_accepts
> >      },
> >  };
> >
> >
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]