qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [VIRTIO PCI PATCH v5 1/1] tran


From: Zhu, Lingshan
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [VIRTIO PCI PATCH v5 1/1] transport-pci: Add freeze_mode to virtio_pci_common_cfg
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:06:33 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.15.1



On 9/20/2023 2:58 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
From: Chen, Jiqian <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 12:03 PM
If driver write 0 to reset device, can the SUSPEND bit be cleared?
It must as reset operation, resets everything else and so the suspend too.

(pci_pm_resume->virtio_pci_restore->virtio_device_restore-
virtio_reset_device)
If SUSPEND is cleared, then during the reset process in Qemu, I can't judge if
the reset request is from guest restore process or not, and then I can't change
the reset behavior.
Reset should not be influenced by suspend.
Suspend should do the work of suspend and reset to do the reset.

The problem to overcome in [1] is, resume operation needs to be synchronous as 
it involves large part of context to resume back, and hence just asynchronously 
setting DRIVER_OK is not enough.
The sw must verify back that device has resumed the operation and ready to 
answer requests.
this is not live migration, all device status and other information still stay in the device, no need to "resume" context, just resume running.

Like resume from a failed LM.

This is slightly different flow than setting the DRIVER_OK for the first time 
device initialization sequence as it does not involve large restoration.

So, to merge two ideas, instead of doing DRIVER_OK to resume, the driver should 
clear the SUSPEND bit and verify that it is out of SUSPEND.

Because driver is still in _OK_ driving the device flipping the SUSPEND bit.
Please read the spec, it says:
The driver MUST NOT clear a device status bit





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]