[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] forward asm symbols vs static
|
From: |
Michael Matz |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] forward asm symbols vs static |
|
Date: |
Sat, 25 Nov 2017 00:54:25 +0100 (CET) |
|
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07) |
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, grischka wrote:
Different calling convention on win64. I'd suggest the attached version
which is more platform neutral.
Yup, that's better.
Ciao,
Michael.
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] forward asm symbols vs static, (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] forward asm symbols vs static, Michael Matz, 2017/11/24
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] forward asm symbols vs static, avih, 2017/11/24
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] forward asm symbols vs static, avih, 2017/11/24
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] forward asm symbols vs static, Michael Matz, 2017/11/25
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] forward asm symbols vs static, grischka, 2017/11/25
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] forward asm symbols vs static, Michael Matz, 2017/11/25
- [Tinycc-devel] Unify C and asm symbols (was: forward asm symbols vs static), Michael Matz, 2017/11/26
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unify C and asm symbols (was: forward asm symbols vs static), Christian Jullien, 2017/11/27
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unify C and asm symbols (was: forward asm symbols vs static), Michael Matz, 2017/11/27
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unify C and asm symbols, grischka, 2017/11/28
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] forward asm symbols vs static,
Michael Matz <=