[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [aps-devel] From source?
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [aps-devel] From source? |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 23:34:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 06:33:05PM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
>
> [...]
I think all this discussion on wether to use sources or binaries is
quite useless. we aim to build a system on which everyone can choose
his/her way to go.
anyway, this kind of discussion can be eternal. otherwise there wouldn't
be any division between Debian and Gentoo ;)
> Back to topic: a Linux port is IMO useful because right now it would provide
> a more solid ground for development. As you mentioned previously (in
> another message), each part of the system can be developed independently,
> and things like dependency, versioning, installing/removing/updating (and
> building, if I get my way trough) can be done in GNU/Linux while the Hurd
> matures.
We can test some components on GNU/Linux (i'm not sure which of them), but
the way we're trying to concieve the whole thing a GNU/Linux port is
unthinkable, because we need a lot of filesystem interfaces to work.
> I have read the whole archives (not a lot to read) and found nothing related
> to this. I'm reading again: (pause) nope, still haven't found. Perhaps it
> was in some message not forwarded to the list?
note that some messages may be lost due to mailman misconfiguration.. i
think i forwarded all them but can't be sure.
> Then by all means I'm staying, someone add me to the savanah project,
> because that is exactly what I want too.
sure
--
Robert Millan
"Omnis enim res, quad dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur,
nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est."
"For if a thing is not diminished by being shared with others, it is
not rightly owned if it is only owned and not shared."
Aurelius Augustinus (354-430)
Re: [aps-devel] From source?, Wolfgang Jaehrling, 2002/12/31