[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error
From: |
Andreas Fehr |
Subject: |
Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:16:26 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time) |
On 2001-03-28, 12:15, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
AJ> Andreas Fehr <address@hidden> writes:
AJ>
AJ> > On 2001-03-28, 01:39, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
AJ> >
AJ> > UD> Andreas Fehr <address@hidden> writes:
AJ> > UD>
AJ> > UD> > -Y `gcc -print-file-name=cpp | sed 's|/cpp$||'`
AJ> > UD>
AJ> > UD> What does
AJ> > UD>
AJ> > UD> gcc -print-file-name=cpp
AJ> > UD>
AJ> > UD> print on your system and what is the content of the directory the
AJ> > UD> named file is in?
AJ> > UD>
AJ> > UD>
AJ> >
AJ> > address@hidden:~/tmp/base/glibc-2.2.2/build > gcc -print-file-name=cpp
AJ> > /lib/cpp
AJ> > address@hidden:~/tmp/base/glibc-2.2.2/build > ls /lib/cpp
AJ> > SYSCALLS.c.X cc1plus crtbegin.o f771 libchill.a libstdc++.a
AJ> > cc1 chillrt0.o crtbeginS.o include libg2c.a specs
AJ> > cc1chill collect2 crtend.o jc1 libgcc.a
AJ> > cc1obj cpp0 crtendS.o jvgenmain libobjc.a
AJ> > address@hidden:~/tmp/base/glibc-2.2.2/build >
AJ> >
AJ> > BTW, as of 'execv: Permission denied' I tried to compile as 'root' but
AJ> > with the same result ('execv: Permission denied').
AJ>
AJ> /lib/cpp should be a program - not a directory. Your installation of
AJ> gcc is broken.
AJ>
Thanks, that's it. gcc-2.95.3 seems to use cpp0 (read somewhere about
this). I created a new symlink .../cpp0 -> /lib/cpp, this did solve this
problem!
I will check my gcc installation.
Now compiling goes on...
Thanks again!!
--
Andreas Fehr
address@hidden
- glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Fehr, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Ulrich Drepper, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Fehr, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Jaeger, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error,
Andreas Fehr <=
- Not a bug but..., Rainer Mager, 2001/03/28
- Re: Not a bug but..., Andreas Jaeger, 2001/03/29
- RE: Not a bug but..., Rainer Mager, 2001/03/29
- Re: Not a bug but..., Andreas Jaeger, 2001/03/29