Re: LessZilla/SeaMonkey: artwork and builds

[incognu]

Quoting Toby Smithe <address@hidden>:

> On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 23:34 -0600, address@hidden wrote:
> > I've started doing some "third-party" SeaMonkey builds inspired by 
> > GNUzilla's
> > work on Iceweasel.
> >
> > Two things:
> >
> > 1. I've rebranded them as "LessZilla" and used some GNU images in
> > creating/assembling artwork for them.
>
> I'm confused about the naming now. I think we (Debian and GNU, and then
> everybody else) should adopt the same names for each product. Having two
> conflicting names for essentially the same thing will be even more
> confusing. We have to choose; I don't think dithering is really option.

As a third party builder naming builds after a proposed name for GNUzilla's
future version of SeaMonkey, my immediate concern is with any objections
GNUzilla might have about my use of the name (which I perceive as theirs,
though without the trademark issues involved with MozCo.)

I've seen LessZilla ( http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnuzilla/ ), Gnuzilla (
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/ ), and IceApe (
http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/118-IceLizard-application-names.html )
suggested for the name of the real thing.  It does seem a good idea for Debian
and GNUzilla to use the same name.

When there's a "real" LessZilla, or Gnuzilla, or IceApe, or whatever, I'll
happily compile appropriately named builds of it!