[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged
From: |
Yoni Rabkin |
Subject: |
Re: [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged |
Date: |
Tue, 31 May 2005 10:10:07 +0300 |
[snip]
> > While compiling toplevel forms in file
> > /home/orchid/src/emms/emms-info-later-do.el:
> > !! Symbol's function definition is void
> > ((cl-byte-compile-compiler-macro))
> > Done
> > make: *** [emms-info-later-do.elc] Error 1
[snip]
To solve this, we need to add the expression (eval-when-compile
(require 'cl)) before any `require' (in other words, as the first
thing) in both emms-info-later-do.el and emms-info-mp3info.el. After
that EMMS will byte compile happily.
If no-one has a problem with that I'll commit those changes tonight
when I get back from work (unless someone commits the fix beforehand).
--
"Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice"
Regards, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell
- [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, (continued)
- [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Lucas Bonnet, 2005/05/25
- Re: [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Jorgen Schaefer, 2005/05/25
- Re: [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Angelina Carlton, 2005/05/25
- Re: [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Yoni Rabkin, 2005/05/25
- [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Lucas Bonnet, 2005/05/25
- Re: [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Angelina Carlton, 2005/05/25
- [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Daniel Brockman, 2005/05/25
- Re: [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Angelina Carlton, 2005/05/25
- Re: [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Angelina Carlton, 2005/05/29
- [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Lucas Bonnet, 2005/05/29
- Re: [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged,
Yoni Rabkin <=
- [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Daniel Brockman, 2005/05/31
- Message not available
- Fwd: [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Yoni Rabkin, 2005/05/31
- [emms-help] Re: cvs vs packaged, Lucas Bonnet, 2005/05/31