[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fluid-dev] Migrating FluidSynth services
From: |
Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas |
Subject: |
Re: [fluid-dev] Migrating FluidSynth services |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 00:13:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) |
On Wednesday, March 31, 2010, address@hidden wrote:
> Hello FluidSynth developers and users,
>
> I will be moving FluidSynth services off of the resonance.org domain.
> I wanted to ask if there are any opinions or ideas on options for the
> various hosted components of the FluidSynth project. It seems like
> some conglomeration of these services might also be a good idea.
>
> Hosted components of the FluidSynth project:
> - Trac web site interface
> - SVN server
> - File download area
> - fluid-dev mailing list
>
> I think that pretty much covers it. I noticed that SourceForge.net
> now has Trac support, as well as git (if we ever want to move to that
> instead of SVN). SourceForge seems to be looking fairly nice these
> days and my only real objection is the advertising. It seems to be
> fairly focused on software related topics though, so at least its not
> some random noise. I would likely move the file releases to
> SourceForge and possibly also the mailing list too, just to bring it
> all to one place.
>
> Any thoughts or opinions on this?
I fully support the proposal. It has little sense to maintain a private server
when there are so many good and free hosting services for free software
projects.
I am a long term SF.net user, with all my projects hosted there and I'm very
happy with the service. Nothing to say about the advertising, either.
About other options, we are already using some Savanna services (mailing list
and download area), but it also offers now SVN and Git:
http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/WhyChooseSavannah
Regards,
Pedro