gnu-linux-libre
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium.


From: Jean Louis
Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium.
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 18:36:53 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:28:18PM -0500, Julie Marchant wrote:
> On 02/04/2019 09:09 AM, bill-auger wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 07:21:13 -0500 Julie wrote:
> > i really must disagree with that - the default copy permissions for
> > every copyrighted work is "none" - in order for that work be be set
> > free, the author must very explicitly label it as such, and try
> > their very best to ensure that their formal statement of permission
> > follows along with any copies of it - if that permission is missing, or
> > difficult to locate or comprehend, there is no reason to assume the work
> > is freely distributable - but dont take it from me - iam just a
> > musician - i am quite certain though, that if you asked a copyright
> > lawyer or judge, that would be their professional opinion
> 
> This is what the Chromium project has to say:
> 
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/LICENSE
> 
> So we're not working on a "no permission"
> default here. The Chromium developers say that's
> the license of Chromium. If they're lying, that
> can be proven. And if you do so, I will be the
> first to admit that I was wrong.
> 
> So, what part of Chromium is not actually
> covered by the Chromium license, and why?

Reference:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28291

I can just see in past that there were issues on
various files and licenses.

If those issues are clarified or finalized, I
don't know.

The other reference I know is that there are some
proprietary plugins which can be enabled in
Chromium. How is that distributed or provided, I
don't know.

Jean




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]