[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC is SOL
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC is SOL |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:09:45 -0000 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386)) |
In gnu.misc.discuss David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> The complaint is not relevant for a settlement out of court anyway.
> The past misconduct can't be cured by distributing complaint source
> with non-corresponding newer binaries.
Why would one want to distribute a writ with the newer binaries? ;-)
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: GPL misappropriation, (continued)
- Re: GPL misappropriation, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Mining the Blogosphere, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, chrisv, 2010/05/04
- Re: Mining the Blogosphere, Moshe, 2010/05/04