[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL misappropriation
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL misappropriation |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:10:22 -0000 |
RJack wrote:
[...]
> None of those *six* things involve "authorizing" others to "authorize".
> You're seeing double dear DAK.
Dak is of opinion that the BSDL is a sort of
http://www.ftb.ca.gov/law/Poa/index.shtml (POA with the entire world
named as an attoney in fact LOL) authorizing GNUtains to license BSDL'd
works on behalf of BSDL copyright owners under the GPL!!!
Clearly, dak boy is insane...
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system
so that I can do the builds."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: GPL misappropriation, (continued)
- Re: GPL misappropriation, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/05/04