groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] me docs


From: Bernd Warken
Subject: Re: [Groff] me docs
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:03:32 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 08:36:39AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> 
> I like the idea.  Probably the only reason why other documents don't
> do this by default is the missing `.mso' request in Unix troff.
> Contrary to, say, TeX, there is no dumped macro package in groff which
> could speed up the loading of the macro package, so I can't see any
> disadvantage.
 
Unknown commands are just ignored.

> The question is whether man pages should use this mechanism also --
> probably an overkill since `man' handles this properly.

We could provide some man facilities to groffview.  Maybe a .manso 
request.

Bernd Warken


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]