[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Help-smalltalk] Re: Mingwin Patch
From: |
Bonzini |
Subject: |
[Help-smalltalk] Re: Mingwin Patch |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:45:37 +0100 |
> Are you sure you want to? I would rather see "CYGWIN" special-cased
> (since it follows POSIX semantics) while MINGW32 and plain-old Windows
> WIN32 use the same "Windows-y" behavior.
Hmmm... you're right in principle, but I'd rather avoid supporting MSVC,
also because it would mean shipping a pre-cooked config.h, and because it
does not support && (address-of-label) which gives an "interesting"
performance boost.
Paolo
- [Help-smalltalk] Re: Mingwin Patch, Bonzini, 2003/02/27
- [Help-smalltalk] RE: Mingwin Patch, Brent Fulgham, 2003/02/27
- [Help-smalltalk] Re: Mingwin Patch,
Bonzini <=
- [Help-smalltalk] RE: Mingwin Patch, Brent Fulgham, 2003/02/27
- RE: [Help-smalltalk] RE: Mingwin Patch, Brent Fulgham, 2003/02/28
- RE: [Help-smalltalk] RE: Mingwin Patch, Brent Fulgham, 2003/02/28
- RE: [Help-smalltalk] RE: Mingwin Patch, Brent Fulgham, 2003/02/28
- RE: [Help-smalltalk] RE: Mingwin Patch, Brent Fulgham, 2003/02/28