[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax
From: |
Sungjin Chun |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:50:24 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
In fact, I just want more less typing and easy-to-remember syntax for
this. +/- is just from my experience in Obj-C. Other syntax which is
rather simple will be OK.
Sungjin.
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> What about +/- for class/instance method like Objective-C? I think your
>> example is rather complex for defining class/instance method. For other
>> parts I actually does not have good/bad points.
>
> If I head written #new as an instance method, for example, I think
> Stefan (or somebody else for him) could have spotted the problem
> with this syntax. I find instead very confusing to remember which
> of +/- is a class and which is an instance method.
>
> Also, UML has hijacked +/- for public/private respectively, which
> can only add to the confusion.
>
> Paolo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF8gDQQqspS1+XJHgRAku0AKDgvnF5Qb/CByOy0M/wflv5qyEJmgCgqtIY
Pks9et8zZGqg+taWZJ0P0OY=
=ufPY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/03/09
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, Stefan Schmiedl, 2007/03/09
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, Sungjin Chun, 2007/03/09
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, parasti, 2007/03/09
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, parasti, 2007/03/10
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, Mike Anderson, 2007/03/11
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, parasti, 2007/03/11
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/03/12