[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automatic beaming with rest
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Automatic beaming with rest |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Apr 2019 11:37:46 -0400 |
Hi David,
> So if we have
> { \time 4/4 c'8 r4 c'8 8 8 8 8 }
> will there be a beam across r4?
Would there be a beam across
c'8 c'4 c'8
? If yes, then yes; if no, then no.
> What if we have r8 r8 instead?
Would there be a beam across
c'8 c'8 c'8 c'8
? If yes, then yes; if no, then no.
> Do beaming exceptions count for rests?
I would think so… but I’ll have to look more closely at exactly how beam
exceptions work.
Cheers,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, (continued)
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, David Kastrup, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, David Kastrup, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, David Kastrup, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Carl Sorensen, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, David Kastrup, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Br. Samuel Springuel, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2019/04/02