[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automatic beaming with rest
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Automatic beaming with rest |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:31:27 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.7.190210 |
On 4/2/19, 9:41 AM, "Kieren MacMillan" <address@hidden> wrote:
>Hi David,
>> What is the "beat" as defined for the beam?
> Perhaps I should use the word "moment"… Example: In 3/4, one can set the
autobeamer to beam sub-quarter notes as 3, or 2+1, or 1+2, or 1+1+1 (or even
other options, I suppose). The moment an auto-beam encompasses (as a result of
the current settings) is the "beat" I was talking about.
I think that if we can get smarter autobeaming (like we need to do to get
subdivision and tuplets done right) we can do beaming over rests. Probably we
need to do a two-pass beam check to get the autobeaming right for subdivision,
and if we do two-pass, we can beam over rests. Right now, with our one-pass
algorithm, a rest stops the beam.
Carl
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, David Kastrup, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, David Kastrup, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, David Kastrup, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, David Kastrup, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Br. Samuel Springuel, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02