[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?
From: |
Hugh Sasse |
Subject: |
Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive? |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:18:12 +0000 (WET) |
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Jeff Kingston wrote:
> > Conventionally among GNU stuff LIBDIR is /usr/local/lib, and
> > if anyone installed it there, they'd be rather shocked after an
> > uninstall.
>
> After reading this and the various responses, I've changed the
> name of symbol LIBDIR in the Lout makefile to LOUTLIBDIR for
> the next release.
Thank you.
>
> The comment at the top of the file does say very clearly that
> this directory will be created. But we all know that no-one
Yes, it does, I read it. But it does not state that it should not
exist before, what will happen if it does, or that it will be
completely removed on uninstall.
> reads documentation.
>
> Jeff
>
Hugh
- Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, (continued)
- Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, Jeff Kingston, 2006/03/03
- Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, Hugh Sasse, 2006/03/06
- Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, Hugh Sasse, 2006/03/06
- Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, Michael Piotrowski, 2006/03/06
- Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, Hugh Sasse, 2006/03/06
- Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, Andreas Kahari, 2006/03/06
- Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, Hugh Sasse, 2006/03/06
- Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, Michael Piotrowski, 2006/03/06
- Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, Hugh Sasse, 2006/03/06
Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, Jeff Kingston, 2006/03/06
- Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?,
Hugh Sasse <=
Re: makefile uninstall somewhat aggressive?, Jeff Kingston, 2006/03/07