lout-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Spell checking a Lout document?


From: Nicholas Clark
Subject: Re: Spell checking a Lout document?
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:14:40 -0700

That's the one. That's what I get for not being at the terminal when I
wrote my response. I meant pdftotext (part of the xpdf distribution,
also installed by default on many distros) and pdftohtml (part of
poppler-utils).


On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Pierre <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Le mardi 17 avril 2012 à 08:33 -0700, Daren Scot Wilson a écrit :
>> Ah, the -p option.   Read about that long ago and somehow haven't had a
>> reason to use it the last few years.  Just tried it and already within a
>> minute found one typo!  If there were a simple way to omit all math and
>> diagram content, this may be the way to go.
>>
>> That pdf2text appears to be Microsoft-only :(
>>
>
> Try "pdftotext"
>
>
> --
> Pierre
>
>



-- 
Nicholas Clark
L-3 Electrical Engineering
Email: address@hidden



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]