[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Mistake in koi8-r support, I think
From: |
Андрей Чернов |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Mistake in koi8-r support, I think |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 1997 23:28:04 +0300 (MSK) |
On Mon, 10 Feb 1997, Christopher R. Maden wrote:
> [Andrey Chernov]
> > And what is incorrect? Visual-only compatibility expected in this
> > case and it looks like per your own words.
>
> Lynx won't do anything wrong - the error was *solely* in the code.
> And, if only Latin characters are available, Euml is definitely the
> thing to use for IOcy. However, Lynx tries to remain "ideologically
> pure" wherever possible, and so in the interest of education, the
> comments should use the name of the character being referred to, not
> another character that happens to look the same. Being Russian, you
> undoubtedly know that, even if the Russian thing-that-looks-like-an-E
> (IEcy or iecy) is transliterated as a Latin E, the Russian
> thing-that-looks-like-an-E- with-two-dots (IOcy or iocy) is a
> different letter altogether, best transliterated as "yo" or "io", not
> as e-with-an-umlaut. The comments in the Lynx code should reflect the
> intent and the Right Thing To Do, so that others who wouldn't know
> this can understand.
It seems you not treat correctly purpose of the comments in this file.
The comments are related to 8859-1 entities to reflect their places into
8859-1, not to specific code set characters at all. So this comment says
that "this national character corresponds to 8859-1 Euml" and nothing
more.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
<address@hidden>
http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;