[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 1998 05:12:14 -0400 (EDT) |
980910 Bela Lubkin wrote:
> I like the counter, but I wish it was expressed in bytes, not Kbytes.
> I would much rather see:
>
> Read 36352 of 87401 bytes of data, 18176 bytes/sec.
>
> than the current:
>
> Read 35 of 85 KB of data. 17 kb/sec.
i heartily agree: there's no reason to truncate things like this
(in any case it should be Kb/s for true SI style).
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, Bela Lubkin, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?,
Philip Webb <=
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, Greg Barniskis, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, dickey, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, Bela Lubkin, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, dickey, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, Leonid Pauzner, 1998/09/11