[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev 1+g help patch - typo
|
From: |
Philip Webb |
|
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev 1+g help patch - typo |
|
Date: |
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 06:08:12 -0500 (EST) |
990304 Klaus Weide wrote:
> Nits...
nuts ... (smile)?
> On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Philip Webb wrote:
>> ! to <em>1g+ 1g- 1p+ 1p-</em> , but otherwise syntax is not cheched.
> ^^^^^^^
> What is the meaning of "otherwise syntax is not checked", anyway?
> That doesn't seem to be useful information.
yes, ok, one of many in Lynx documentation, if you look closely:
i was hurrying to catch the dev.18 deadline, predicted for today.
what's it mean? you haven't been following the long debate, apparently:
LE warned her patches may have unexpected results
if someone enters eg 3gxyz : well, maybe what such keysoups expect ...
further improvements are welcome, incl for the bug i reported today.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto