[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev patch
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev patch |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jul 1999 01:19:05 -0500 (CDT) |
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
>
> > Do your patches do anything about wrapping in SOURCE display?
> > Giving the option to not do the '+' wrapping (i.e. just don't
> > emit LY_SOFT_NEWLINE; revert to behavior before LY_SOFT_NEWLINE
> > was introduced) seems something useful. For one thing, line numbers
> > when 'e'diting source would be right again.
>
> IMO it's better to maintain a 'real line' counter for this purpose (and show
> it on the '=' page).
Yes; making LY_SOFT_NEWLINE optional would just be much simpler
to do.
Klaus
- lynx-dev patch, Vlad Harchev, 1999/07/12
- Re: lynx-dev patch, Klaus Weide, 1999/07/12
- Re: lynx-dev patch, David Woolley, 1999/07/13
- Re: lynx-dev patch, Vlad Harchev, 1999/07/13
- Re: lynx-dev patch - "JUSTIFY", Klaus Weide, 1999/07/14
- Re: lynx-dev patch - "JUSTIFY", Vlad Harchev, 1999/07/14
- Re: lynx-dev patch - "JUSTIFY", Klaus Weide, 1999/07/14
- Re: lynx-dev patch - "JUSTIFY", Vlad Harchev, 1999/07/14
- Re: lynx-dev patch - "JUSTIFY", Philip Webb, 1999/07/14
- Re: lynx-dev patch - "JUSTIFY", mattack, 1999/07/14