[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Jan 2000 04:34:02 -0500 |
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 06:19:47PM -0600, Klaus Weide wrote:
> Leonid and I recently talked about whether 'd'ownload should use
> a source_cache copy. I said then that yes that would make some sense.
> But I've changed my opinion again now...
> 'D'ownload means "download", period. It's always meant that.
> The user can expect that a new download attempt will be made,
> rather than just using a (possibly corrupt) cached copy.
true, as a bit of pedantic fatalism (smile),
but that's surely no reason why Lynx can't ask the user
eg "Download from WWW or use source cache?"
[i'm testing Mutt, as the system elm is still not back from Y2K,
so my usual electronic trolley bus may be missing]
Philip Webb
Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, David Woolley, 2000/01/02
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, pg, 2000/01/03
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, Klaus Weide, 2000/01/03
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, pg, 2000/01/03
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, Klaus Weide, 2000/01/03
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION,
Philip Webb <=
- lynx-dev about downloading and source cache (was: THANKS AND QUESTION), Klaus Weide, 2000/01/04
- Re: lynx-dev about downloading and source cache (was: THANKS AND QUESTION), Vlad Harchev, 2000/01/04
Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, T.E.Dickey, 2000/01/03
Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, Larry W. Virden, 2000/01/04