Re: About the last patch for private variables

[Ramón García]

Something seems to be wrong. I will look at it.

On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Boris Kolpackov<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Also everyone please test this and make sure I didn't break anything.
>> Also I think that the new algorithm is not significantly slower than the
>> previous one but it's probably worth testing on any massive makefiles
>> you happen to have lying around (esp. on makefiles with lots of
>> variables assignments).
>
> I just tested current CVS with my build system (which is quite
> complex) and noticed about ~30% slowdown compared to 3.81. Both
> were built with full optimization. Here are the results of the
> three make-cvs runs:
>
> real 1.05
> user 0.70
> sys 0.35
>
> real 1.04
> user 0.73
> sys 0.29
>
> real 1.06
> user 0.75
> sys 0.30
>
> And here are the three make-3.81 runs:
>
> real 0.71
> user 0.63
> sys 0.04
>
> real 0.68
> user 0.63
> sys 0.05
>
> real 0.71
> user 0.65
> sys 0.04
>
> Notice the difference in the system times. I can run it under oprofile
> and show the timings or I can provide instructions on how to reproduce
> it (the software package that is built is open-source).
>
> Boris
>
> --
> Boris Kolpackov, Code Synthesis Tools   http://codesynthesis.com/~boris/blog
> Open source XML data binding for C++:   http://codesynthesis.com/products/xsd
> Mobile/embedded validating XML parsing: http://codesynthesis.com/products/xsde
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Make-alpha mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-alpha
>