[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: testing
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: testing |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Aug 2003 03:22:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service, linux) |
Rory Toma <address@hidden> writes:
> I propose that we check in a standard monitrc file that has a few common
> processes (apache comes to mind as one) and uses a rich set of features.
> We can use this file on all platforms to test out monit, and can direct
> users to use this file as well if they are having problems.
If you are thinking what I think you are thinking :) it is probably a
good idea. That is; adding a common user test case (for us developers)
by using a common monitrc file. At least we should think out how we
can create test cases we should use during development. The code is
starting to become rather complex and having some sort of automatic
testing would be very useful.
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
- Ctrl-C strangeness -> SEGFault, Christian Hopp, 2003/08/14
- Re: Ctrl-C strangeness -> SEGFault, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/08/14
- Proposal: testing, Rory Toma, 2003/08/14
- Re: Proposal: testing,
Jan-Henrik Haukeland <=
- Re: Proposal: testing, Rory Toma, 2003/08/14
- Re: Proposal: testing, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/08/14
- Re: Proposal: testing, Rory Toma, 2003/08/14
- Re: Proposal: testing, Rory Toma, 2003/08/14
- Re: Proposal: testing, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/08/18
- status, Rory Toma, 2003/08/22
- Re: Proposal: testing, Christian Hopp, 2003/08/15
Re: Ctrl-C strangeness -> SEGFault, Christian Hopp, 2003/08/15