[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: monit '-i' option?
From: |
Rory Toma |
Subject: |
Re: monit '-i' option? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:50:55 -0700 |
This should probably be extended to include an integer number.
The syntax would be:
monit -i 3
where 3 would tell how many poll cycles to skip before starting
monitoring.
Why would you do this? If you start monit from inittab, and you have
some monitored processes that take can take a long time to come up the
first time or at boot, it is useful to not try to restart them right
away.
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 13:54, Christian Hopp wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
>
> >
> > I didn't add this, and unless someone steps up and explain the
> > rationale for this switch, I suggest we remove it. The time limit is
> > two hours :-)
>
> I have neither used it in the past nor I know what it does!
>
> > Martin Pala <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > i don't understand validate option '-i'.
> > [*]
>
> CHopp
--
Rory Toma address@hidden
VP of Run Level 9 http://www.trs80.net
Digeo Digital http://www.digeo.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- monit '-i' option?, Martin Pala, 2003/09/13
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/09/14
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Christian Hopp, 2003/09/14
- Re: monit '-i' option?,
Rory Toma <=
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Martin Pala, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Rory Toma, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Rory Toma, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Martin Pala, 2003/09/16