[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: interpretation of collection names
From: |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: interpretation of collection names |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:39:53 +0200 (CEST) |
In message <address@hidden> on Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:57:52 -0400, "graydon hoare"
<address@hidden> said:
graydon> On 29 Sep 2004 13:34:28 +0200, Peter Simons <address@hidden> wrote:
graydon>
graydon> > But it's a convention that might be difficult do adhere to
graydon> > with that feature in place. Say, I own the domain "org.con",
graydon> > you own "org.contrived". So either I call my collection
graydon> > "org.con." or I end up having all your data in it, too! That
graydon> > doesn't sound good, IMHO.
graydon>
graydon> no, I agree, it's a bug.
OK, you da boss :-).
graydon> collections themselves are probably a bug.
You'll probably find me agreeing with that a lot more.
graydon> but all this, on my list, comes after finishing the changeset
graydon> branch, fixing up cr/lf issues on win32, and integrating the
graydon> ssh and restriction branches.
Oh yeah, the CRLF issue that I was looking into. Time to look into it
again with refreshed eyes...
Cheers,
Richard
-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis