|
From: | Lapo Luchini |
Subject: | [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs |
Date: | Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:47:48 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050317 Thunderbird/1.0.2 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0 Hamster/2.0.0.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What makes me chuckle with an evil grin in this discussion is that probably the use of hash values in monotone was one of the main features that convinced me it was more "worth trying" then the other distributed ones ;-) (another very important one was the use of SQLite, which is brililant) - -- L a p o L u c h i n i l a p o @ l a p o . i t w w w . l a p o . i t / -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkMgv5QACgkQaJiCLMjyUvsMSQCeLS4bPWqe+hTZvvUaNVLpg3N+ IAgAoMSRjm2s9VRfrAfw9NV1Ywkva9zn =WiFf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |