[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs
From: |
Brian Downing |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:55:54 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:06:56AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jon Bright:
>
> > I also agree with this. For me,
> >
> > 568b-2462-456e-9a57-4326-93df-936d-4835
> >
> > would be much more readable than
> >
> > 568b2462456e9a57432693df936d4835
>
> Only the latter can be copied to the X selection with a single double
> click.
Throw:
XTerm*charClass: 45:48
into whatever X resources file you prefer and the former will select the
same as the latter.
("Modern" Linux distributions are starting to throw a huge laundry list
of characters into this group by default, including slash, which annoys
me. Undoing this behavior is the only reason I'm aware of this
resource.)
I suppose one could say that 568b_2462_456e_9a57_4326_93df_936d_4835
would select that way by default, but it is less readable than with
hyphens to me.
-bcd
--
*** Brian Downing <bdowning at lavos dot net>
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Hendrik Boom, 2005/09/09
Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Steven Grimm, 2005/09/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Howard Spindel, 2005/09/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Bruce Stephens, 2005/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Chad Walstrom, 2005/09/08
- magic selectors (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs), Nathaniel Smith, 2005/09/09
- Re: magic selectors (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs), Zbynek Winkler, 2005/09/10
- [Monotone-devel] Re: magic selectors, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/09/10