[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate'
From: |
Timothy Brownawell |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate' |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Aug 2006 07:52:25 -0500 |
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 10:21 +0200, Thomas Keller wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >> SELECT ra1.child
> >> FROM revision_ancestry ra1
> >> LEFT JOIN revision_ancestry ra2 ON ra1.child=ra2.parent
> >> INNER JOIN revision_certs rc ON ra1.child=rc.id AND rc.name="branch"
> >> AND rc.value LIKE "net.venge.monotone"
> >> WHERE ra2.parent IS NULL
> >> GROUP BY ra1.child
> >
> > Okay, I've spent a few minutes staring at this, and I give up :-).
> > Can you break down what it does in English?
>
> Okay, here we go:
>
> a) we left join the revision_anchestry table with itself to find any
> child revision which is not parent revision of another record (thus
> ra2.parent IS NULL); simple speak we find all leaves
> b) then we inner join with the certs table to ensure that we only get
> those leaves which have a particular branch cert attached, thus are
> heads of that branch
It does not work for branches where the branch heads aren't leaves in
the revision graph. For example, it fails on net.venge.monotone.visualc8
or net.venge.monotone.tbrownaw.tester-spinoff .
It also doesn't allow for checking to see if we actually trust the
branch certs we're using.
Tim
--
Free public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net
- Re: [Monotone-devel] responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', Thomas Keller, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', Thomas Keller, 2006/08/07
- [Monotone-devel] Re: responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', Bruce Stephens, 2006/08/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', Thomas Keller, 2006/08/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', Timothy Brownawell, 2006/08/07
- [Monotone-devel] Re: responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', Bruce Stephens, 2006/08/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate',
Timothy Brownawell <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', Thomas Moschny, 2006/08/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', Thomas Keller, 2006/08/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] responses to some IRC discussion of 'automate', Thomas Keller, 2006/08/07