[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction
From: |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Sep 2006 09:07:43 +0200 (CEST) |
In message <address@hidden> on Thu, 07 Sep 2006 09:06:15 +0200 (CEST), Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker <address@hidden> said:
richard> I still don't understand why keys would be stored by name. In the
richard> rest of the security community, keys are identified by a form of hash,
richard> or a fingerprint if you will. There is of course the usual risk that
richard> you can get two keys with the same hash (fingerprint), but since a key
richard> has certain properties and a structure that can't be altered without
richard> invalidating it, the risk is minimal, so in essense, you can
richard> practically say that there's a 1:1 mapping between keys and their
richard> fingerprint.
Oh, and I'm not saying that *users* should have to identify keys by
key id, just the software itself.
Cheers,
Richard
- [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction,
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Justin Patrin, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/08
Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Thomas Keller, 2006/09/07