[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction
From: |
Koen Kooi |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:18:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Keller schreef:
> Nathaniel Smith schrieb:
>> We call the user-specified revid the "trust seed". The "seed" part
>> emphasises that we are not (necessarily) trusting the tree we point
>> to in particular. Rather, one of the things a tree should have ACLs
>> for, is specifying who is allowed to commit _new trust trees_. The
>> simplest way to do this is to put the trust trees in a special branch,
>> and specify commit access to this branch like any other branch.
>
> So if I understand this correctly, the commit access to the trust tree
> is defined by the trust tree itself? Is this not some chicken-egg
> problem? Or is monotone then delivered with a "default" tree (or has
> some command which can build such a tree)?
How does it handle this:
mtn co -r<rev before I got banned> ; <mayhem> ;mtn commit ?
regards,
Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFE/9XBMkyGM64RGpERAnvQAJ4+helelfdaSnil93cAVBJqtEkgcACfW+y0
IZNlwCxJYIWvNik7AWgb4yg=
=P2vG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Justin Patrin, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/08
Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Thomas Keller, 2006/09/07
- [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction,
Koen Kooi <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Thomas Moschny, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/08
Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/07
[Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Bruce Stephens, 2006/09/07