[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction
From: |
Nathaniel Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Sep 2006 02:40:40 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 09:50:02AM +0200, Thomas Keller wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith schrieb:
> > We call the user-specified revid the "trust seed". The "seed" part
> > emphasises that we are not (necessarily) trusting the tree we point
> > to in particular. Rather, one of the things a tree should have ACLs
> > for, is specifying who is allowed to commit _new trust trees_. The
> > simplest way to do this is to put the trust trees in a special branch,
> > and specify commit access to this branch like any other branch.
>
> So if I understand this correctly, the commit access to the trust tree
> is defined by the trust tree itself? Is this not some chicken-egg
> problem? Or is monotone then delivered with a "default" tree (or has
> some command which can build such a tree)?
The seed lets you bootstrap -- whatever revision is given in the seed
is trusted, a priori. Then we can use whatever rules it says to
figure out what the next trusted revision, and so on and so forth.
-- Nathaniel
--
"Of course, the entire effort is to put oneself
Outside the ordinary range
Of what are called statistics."
-- Stephan Spender
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, (continued)
Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Thomas Keller, 2006/09/07
- [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Koen Kooi, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Thomas Moschny, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/08
Re: [Monotone-devel] [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction,
Nathaniel Smith <=
[Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Bruce Stephens, 2006/09/07
[Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Graydon Hoare, 2006/09/07
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [RFC] versioned policy -- introduction, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/08