[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent?
From: |
Christof Petig |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent? |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:03:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115) |
Hi Nathaniel,
Nathaniel J. Smith schrieb:
>> - lookahead = *curr;
>> + lookahead = *curr & 0xff;
>
> Using:
> lookahead = widen<int,char>(*curr);
> is better (I guess maybe with a comment? this is exactly the sort of
> situation widen<> is designed for, though), and this patch appears to
> use tabs instead of spaces for indentation, but yeah, fine to commit.
I added a comment and used widen<unsigned int,char> since
widen<int,char> still does sign extension.
Yours
Christof
PS: I _shall_ not need funding for the summit. IMHO if fully apprenticed
university engineers with a paid job ask for funding something is going
wrong indead. OTOH paying the flight just because of a hobby hurts my
family's holiday budget, too.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent?, Christof Petig, 2006/12/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent?, Nathaniel J. Smith, 2006/12/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent?, Christof Petig, 2006/12/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent?, Nathaniel J. Smith, 2006/12/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent?,
Christof Petig <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Summit funding, was: basic_io not binary transparent?, Christof Petig, 2006/12/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Summit funding, was: basic_io not binary transparent?, Christof Petig, 2006/12/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Summit funding, was: basic_io not binary transparent?, Nathaniel J. Smith, 2006/12/19