monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Monotone-devel] Re: Do we really need to IDN-encode cert names, keypair


From: Koen Kooi
Subject: [Monotone-devel] Re: Do we really need to IDN-encode cert names, keypair ids, and database variable domains?
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:37:12 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Zack Weinberg schreef:

> Thoughts?  I should emphasise that I'm not suggesting this for the
> release Richard wants to make Thursday.  That would be entirely too
> risky.  Also, as a data point, neither the Monotone nor the Pidgin
> databases contain any strings that would be changed by this proposal.

What about the OE database? And while on the OE subject, why not use the
 OE database in your performance tests, since it's by far the biggest
and slooooooooowest repository that is publically available and used in
real life

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFHGwGoMkyGM64RGpERAsPwAJ9Oef6v6lYdffmVqhnwIMGMuLgJgwCgpOdw
bRIpqZgBQ/gvSmiigCn9pKI=
=HLBY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]