[Monotone-devel] Re: Do we really need to IDN-encode cert names, keypair ids, and database variable domains?

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Zack Weinberg schreef:
>>> Thoughts?  I should emphasise that I'm not suggesting this for the
>>> release Richard wants to make Thursday.  That would be entirely too
>>> risky.  Also, as a data point, neither the Monotone nor the Pidgin
>>> databases contain any strings that would be changed by this proposal.
>> What about the OE database?
> 
> Same.  But you don't have to take my word for it:
> 
> $ mtn -d OE.mtn db execute "select distinct domain from db_vars" | grep xn--
> $ mtn -d OE.mtn db execute "select distinct name from revision_certs"
> | grep xn--
> $ mtn -d OE.mtn db execute "select distinct id from public_keys" | grep xn--
> 
>> And while on the OE subject, why not use the
>>  OE database in your performance tests, since it's by far the biggest
>> and slooooooooowest repository that is publically available and used in
>> real life
> 
> I'll do that in the future, but the snapshot is not that much bigger
> than my local monotone database:
> 
> -rw-r--r-- 1 zack zack 154M 2007-10-20 11:23 monotone.mtn
> -rw-r--r-- 1 zack zack 183M 2007-10-20 21:39 OE.mtn

Try doing operations on the org.openembedded.dev branch (e.g. a clean
pull) and you'll notice it is *way* slower than pulling any net.venge
branch :(

regards,

Koen

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFHGw/BMkyGM64RGpERApDnAKCzvoCg/itADpZ1MVSVulvJXg0/WwCfQNsz
7RWFZJSQkTi/ubZ1avUI/pg=
=luBX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----