Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone

[Sebastian]

Markus Schiltknecht schrieb:
>
> While this list of *lacking* features is very appreciated, I feel it's
> also important to point out where monotone is shining.
>
> What comes to my mind:
>
>  - very strong integrity checking
>  - compiled C++ code, not interpreted
>  - pretty thought-through and flexible certification concept (IMO)
>  - database backend (SQL compliance)
>  - dedicated multi-branch netsync protocol
>  - ease of extensibility by lua hooks
>
> I'm sure there's much more...

 ...like
   - just put a mtn binary in your $PATH and use your online-Repo over
ssh (couldn't find any other RCS doing this).

There are drawbacks on all the others too. I like monotone the best.