Re: [Monotone-devel] Monotone windows release 0.44....

[J Decker]

Hrm... that doesn't help me.... that's a list from a Linux or other
distribution, the subject is Windows 0.44.

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Zack Weinberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> zlib most definitely is used, but it might not be that copy of it
> that's getting used.  libpcrecpp-0.dll and libpcreposix-0.dll, on the
> other hand, are definitely *not* needed.  We don't play tricks with
> LoadLibrary as far as I know.
>
> For reference, this is the set of libraries required in an
> as-dynamically-linked-as-possible Linux build:
>
> $ objdump --private-headers /usr/bin/mtn | grep NEEDED
>  NEEDED               libpcre.so.3
>  NEEDED               libbotan-1.8.2.so
>  NEEDED               liblua5.1.so.0
>  NEEDED               libsqlite3.so.0
>  NEEDED               libidn.so.11
>  NEEDED               libz.so.1
>  NEEDED               libstdc++.so.6
>  NEEDED               libm.so.6
>  NEEDED               libgcc_s.so.1
>  NEEDED               libc.so.6
>
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:11 PM, J Decker <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Why are zlib1.dll, libpcrecpp-0.dll and libpcreposix-0.dll  included
>> in the installation if they aren't used?
>>
>> copying mtn and dependancies only copes [ libiconv-2.dll libidn-11.dll
>> libintl-8.dll libpcre-0.dll mtn.exe  ]
>>
>> I guess they might be dynamically loaded with LoadLibrary and
>> GetProcAddress... but there's no reference of the text 'zlib' in any
>> of the files except zlib1.dll...  uhmm I guess it might be unicode...
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Monotone-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
>>
>