monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Version 0.46 breaks monotone-viz and mtn-browse


From: Anthony Edward Cooper
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Version 0.46 breaks monotone-viz and mtn-browse
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:18:26 -0000
User-agent: SquirrelMail

Hello,

I am aiming to look at this this weekend. Hopefully this will be the
biggest break in protocol for some time. I can see the need.

I will not be supporting the ticker stream stuff other than perhaps, at
most shoving the raw data down a file descriptor (i.e. a pipe), as to do
more does not make much sense in a function call-return paradigm.

Nuno - Can you not stick with 0.45 for the time being? Also how did that
code set menu work out? (Can reply to me directly).

Cheers,

Tony.
> Am 28.01.2010 14:42, schrieb Nuno Lucas:
>> [Re-sent with the right, subscribed to the list, e-mail]
>>
>>
>> It seems both monotone-viz and mtn-browse get stuck with the automate
>> stdio
>> changes on 0.46. Is this intentional?
>>
>> I know monotone is still not considered "stable", but shouldn't at least
>> strive
>> to remain compatible with such useful programs? At least for
>> monotone-viz, I
>> consider it to be essential when using monotone, and mtn-browse is on
>> the way to
>>  be the same.
>
> I've contacted Anthony E. Cooper (the author of mtn-browse and the
> underlying perl lib) before the release of 0.46 and he said he was
> willing to provide an updated version shortly after the release. I don't
> know what his current status is however.
>
> The issue with monotone-viz is a bit different. Olivier told me that he
> cannot actively develop on this application anymore, but is still
> willing to provide smallish updates. Thomas Moschny contacted him
> already afaik because he packages monotone with Fedora and has a broken
> monotone-viz package as well...
>
> In general the modifications to both programs / libs should be rather
> smallish - I've adapted the code for guitone in about half an hour
> (while ignoring out-of-band chatter and especially tickers, but even
> that should be doable in less than a day).
>
> If anybody seeks for implementation help on any of these two clients,
> drop me a note via IRC, I'm happy to help out.
>
> Thomas.
>
> --
> GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
> Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
> on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
> of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en
>
>
>






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]