Re: [Monotone-devel] automate serve?

[Thomas Keller]

Am 26.09.10 16:36, schrieb Stephen Leake:
> In implementing the DVC front-end for automate sync, I've run into a
> problem.
> 
> If I use ssh: or file: netsync schemes, the mtn process that is started
> outputs startup error messages that are not properly packetized for
> automate stdio. [...]

If you read over this again, how do you think would an automate version
of serve make any changes to this behaviour? The mtn instance that is
called would still use a completely different package stream (which must
not be intermixed with the packet stream of the parent process) and to
get _any_ kind of packeting there you'd anyways need to call it over
stdio there.

Or maybe I'm misunderstanding something... clear me up :)

Thomas.

-- 
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature